Advertise Write for Us

Who Was Better: Starks or Sprewell?

July 27, 2011 – Kevin Burke

John Starks and Latrell Sprewell were two of the best Shooting Guards of 90s. Although they took a backseat to their off-guard brethren such as Michael Jordan and Reggie Miller, they were more than serviceable and were instrumental pieces to their respective teams.

Sprewell is most remembered for the questionable things he did away from the court. Most notably, when we hear his name, we think about him choking then coach, P.J. Carlesimo during practice. Then allegedly after leaving the practice facility following his assault on P.J., he came back 20 minutes later, looking to go back at Carlesimo. And who can forget him turning down a 3-year, $21M deal because he didn’t think it was enough since he had “a family to feed.” That decision would actually end his career because he was never offered anything remotely close to that again.

But put all of that aside. Sprewell, a four-time all-star, was a beast in his day. I especially liked his game in Golden State. He was a high-flying, mean-mugging scoring machine.  In his six years as a Warrior, he averaged at least 20 points four times, including 24 ppg in the 1996 – 97 season. Many forget that he was actually an All-NBA First Team selection in his second season. But as a result of the Carlesimo incident, he was dealt to New York, ironically for an aging John Starks.

While in New York, Sprewell became a fan favorite, had a new look, and people soon forgot about his troubled past. He became an all-star in New York and helped the Knicks reach the Finals in the lockout-shortened 1999 season, before eventually being dealt to Minnesota in 2004. In 13 seasons, Latrell’s career scoring average was 18.3ppg.

Prior to being traded for Sprewell in 1999, John Starks was the heart and soul of the Knicks along with Patrick Ewing and Charles Oakley. Despite being from Oklahoma, Starks embodied New York on the court. Everything from the chest pounding, to holding up his jersey to the crowd to show the “New York” across the chest, Starks’ emotion was incredible.

John’s darkest day on the court, of course, came on the biggest stage: Game 7 of the 1994 NBA Finals against Rockets where he went a woeful 2 – 18 from the floor. He is largely blamed for costing the Knicks the championship that year because of that shooting performance, but I’ve always believed it to be foolish and unfair to pin it all on Starks. But I digress.

Starks never posted the gaudy scoring number that Sprewell did, as his best season produced 19ppg. However, that is largely because Starks played on much better teams than Sprewell did during their respective primes. It’s hard to score 20 a game when you played most of your career with one of the 50 Greatest Players of All-Time in Patrick Ewing.

The Sooner state native was never afraid to go toe-to-toe with the opposition such as Michael Jordan and Reggie Miller. Those guys would usually get the best of John, but they got the best of every other Shooting Guard too.  Who can forget Starks’ baseline left-handed dunk over Horace Grant and Michael Jordan (Even though Mike tried to pull his hand back at the last second. Too late Mike, you’re in the poster) in the 1993 playoffs in what has simple been known as “The Dunk”? Starks was an incredible competitor and was feared by many around the League. His career scoring average was 12.5ppg in 13 seasons.

In deciding who was the better Shooting Guard between these two guys, you almost have to throw out their career scoring averages because, again, Starks always played on better teams with guys who could score. Based on that, Sprewell’s numbers and overall career accolades look a lot better but that doesn’t tell the whole story. Having said all of that, who was the better player?

If you’re looking for your everyday, predictable basketball talk, then you’ve come to the wrong place, because Kevin Burke of The Kevin Burke Project brings provocative, thought provoking content about basketball as only he can. Kevin also hosts The Hoop Doctors weekly podcast show, which you can subscribe to for free on iTunes. Follow Kevin on Twitter and Facebook

Check Out These Hot Stories On The Web

Comments

  • Spree

    Lol. Sprewell. But this is coming from a guy who loved Sprewell and hated Starks. But all that aside, I still think Sprewell was really the better player.
    I never knew he went back at Carlisimo though; but that’s good for his loud disrespectful ass.

  • http://www.morninghoop.blogspot.com Tom

    They were both good players, but I think Spreewell was a bigger impact player. I also liked his style of play more. When it came to MMA skills he was also superior. He could choke you out, but Starks could only head butt his opponent.

  • http://www.morninghoop.blogspot.com Tom

    They were both good players, but I think Spreewell was a bigger impact player. I also liked his style of play more. When it came to MMA skills he was also superior. He could choke you out, but Starks could only head butt his opponent.

  • http://www.morninghoop.blogspot.com Tom

    They were both good players, but I think Spreewell was a bigger impact player. I also liked his style of play more. When it came to MMA skills he was also superior. He could choke you out, but Starks could only head butt his opponent.

  • http://twitter.com/TrueOmegaNexus The Ascended

    Spreewell was the better player BUT Starks was the better Knick with more years of quality heart felt service.

  • Pingback: Better Player: Allan Houston or Michael Redd? | The Hoop Doctors

  • http://twitter.com/BigMannyP Manny Pagan

    Cool article Kevin. I’m John Starks biggest fan and supporter, and I don’t blame him for the Game 7 finals at all, because if you look at the whole big picture, the Knicks wouldn’t not have the season they had or even be in a game 7, if it weren’t for Starks, having his best season as a pro in the 1993-94 campaign. He was vital to the team in every aspect. Whenever I think about him, i have nothing but good memories. With that said, I was very sad when he was traded for Sprewell (more so because of being a very strong Starks supporter, even while someone like Houston took his starting spot when he was brought over in ’96). I remember just the season or two prior, they (Latrell & John) had a great battle at a Warriors’ home game, both very demonstrative, towards each other, on the court. I knew “Spree” was a great scorer, and had very good defensive skills, so at the very least, I wasn’t worried about how this would turn out, even with all the stuff that happened with PJ and the certain on-goings, with the Warriors organization. As a lifelong Knick fan, I welcomed him here, and I wasn’t surprised at all on how he would perform. The chip on his shoulder was huge so he knew what he had to do, with a second chance, and at least for NY, he made the best of it.
    Anyway, my answer is: John Starks.
    Starks played with an, in his prime Ewing and had better all-around teams that he supported and sometimes led. That season he averaged 19.0ppg, he was injured 3 quarters of the way through the season, came back and still played just as well, if not better, en route to the Finals. A full year Finals (unlike Sprewell’s lockout shortened season… which I was still proud of).
    John was intense of both end of the courts, all the time, and played with his heart on his sleeve and showed it EVERY night, to the fans. Now, I do love Sprewell, and he played hard, but there were times where he seemed disinterested… I’ve noticed it on many occasions. Was Sprewell a better, all-around scorer in his prime, than Starks? No question!
    But did he have a bigger impact, with his respective Knick team than Starks: No.
    Starks was more vital to his teams than Sprewell was to his.
    Being a better all around player to me, means what you provided, service wise, what kind of teammate you are/were, making your team better and how you carried yourself with your peers (granted, no surprise that John was a hot-head at MANY times… but it also helped him more to be a fiery type of SG, than to be quiet or passive).
    Anyway… I always like writing about John, Spree and/or the Knicks in general, so thanks for the arena.

  • http://twitter.com/BigMannyP Manny Pagan

    Cool article Kevin. I’m John Starks biggest fan and supporter, and I don’t blame him for the Game 7 finals at all, because if you look at the whole big picture, the Knicks wouldn’t have the season they had or even be in a game 7, if it weren’t for Starks, having his best season as a pro in the 1993-94 campaign. He was vital to the team in every aspect. Whenever I think about him, I have nothing but good memories. With that said, I was very sad when he was traded for Sprewell (more so because of being a very strong Starks supporter, even while someone like Houston took his starting spot when he was brought over in ’96). I recall, just the season or two prior, they (Latrell & John) had a great battle at a Warriors’ home game, both very demonstrative, towards each other, on the court. I knew “Spree” was a great scorer, and had very good defensive skills, so at the very least, I wasn’t worried about how this would turn out, even with all the stuff that happened with PJ and the certain on-goings, with the Warriors organization. As a lifelong Knick fan, I welcomed him here, and I wasn’t surprised at all on how he would perform. The chip on his shoulder was huge so he knew what he had to do, with a second chance, and at least for NY, he made the best of it.
    Anyway, my answer is: John Starks.
    Starks played with an, in his prime Ewing and had better all-around teams that he supported and sometimes led. That season he averaged 19.0ppg, he was injured 3 quarters of the way through the season, came back and still played just as well, if not better, en route to the Finals. A full year Finals (unlike Sprewell’s lockout shortened season… which I was still proud of).
    John was intense of both end of the courts, all the time, and played with his heart on his sleeve and showed it EVERY night, to the fans. Now, I do love Sprewell, and he played hard, but there were times where he seemed disinterested… I’ve noticed it on many occasions. Was Sprewell a better, all-around scorer in his prime, than Starks? No question!
    But did he have a bigger impact, with his respective Knick team than Starks: No.
    Starks was more vital to his teams than Sprewell was to his.
    Being a better all around player to me, means what you provided, service wise, what kind of teammate you are/were, selflessness, making your team better and how you carried yourself with your peers (granted, no surprise that John was a hot-head at MANY times… but it also helped him more, to be a fiery type of SG, than to be quiet or passive).
    Anyway… I always like writing about John, Spree and/or the Knicks in general, so thanks for the avenue.