The Boston Celtics have bigger problems than coming to grips with the departures of Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce. Like the future of Rajon Rondo.
With Garnett and Pierce moving on to the Brooklyn Nets, the Celtics have instantly become Rondo’s team. To be honest, this is the moment Boston was waiting for. Every year the Celtics inched closer to referring to Rondo as their primary lifeline, but he was never completely heralded as the franchise’s cornerstone next to Garnett and Pierce.
Now there’s nothing preventing him from becoming the most important building block for the Celtics. Trades and free-agency signings will be made with him in mind before anyone else. That is, if he isn’t the one who winds up being traded.
Gary Washburn of the Boston Globe wrote that general manager Danny Ainge and company intended to build around Rondo. Then he himself reported that the Dallas Mavericks came calling about the point man, and that the Celtics were asking for Dirk Nowitzki in return. Clearly, that wasn’t going to happen, but that Boston considered moving him at all is noteworthy.
Further complicating matters is Rondo’s distaste for the Garnett and Pierce trade. No one in Boston really liked that deal because of what it signified, least of all Rondo. Since then, according to Alex Kennedy of Hoopsworld, Rondo has made it clear he wants the Celtics to bring in Josh Smith.
Aside from the obvious fact that the Celtics still don’t have the necessary cap room and will likely fall short in terms of tradable assets to makes this happen, chasing Smith isn’t indicative of a team attempting to start from scratch. J-Smoove is a superstar in his own right, but acquiring him, say, in a sign-and-trade adds more money to the books and all but ensures the Celtics are stuck with Gerald Wallace and Courtney Lee. Not only would the Celtics then not have money to spend to build around Rondo and Smith, they wouldn’t be a legit contender either.
If Smith proves obtainable and he keeps Rondo happy, the Celtics have to consider it. They just do. But if Rondo himself can be flipped in exchange for some first rounders and immediate/future cap relief that makes Boston players on the 2014 free-agency circuit, then that’s something Ainge has to contemplate as well.
Trading him away won’t be easy. Then again, severing ties with superstars never is. And his departure wouldn’t be a reflection of his worth to the franchise or the state of his knee (hopefully). Rather, it’s the Celtics seeing an opportunity to start fresh, opening up draft and free-agency possibilities in the near future.
In the interest of full disclosure, I believe the Celtics wouldn’t hesitate to pull the trigger if the right deal came along. And the right deal isn’t necessary a blockbuster deal for them. Again, first-round selections and monetary savings are the priority. I believe Boston would be beyond interested in such a scenario.
What’s stopping them from being aggressive? For starters, I could be dead wrong. It’s happened before. Or, perhaps the Celtics understand that even rebuilding teams need a reason to generate interest. Chasing Andrew Wiggins in next year’s draft doesn’t qualify on its own.
Beantown is home to one of the most devout fanbases in the NBA, but that doesn’t mean loyalists will flock toward the seats to watch a team headlined by Avery Bradley and Jeff Green. So long as Rondo is in the picture, the Celtics are creating the illusion that they’re playing for something other than tomorrow now.
That’s the dilemma the Celtics are facing. They’re officially committed to a rebuild, but there’s one mitigating circumstance that still needs to be addressed before they map out a definitive blueprint. And it’s the future of Rondo. They must determine if they stand to gain in the long run by dealing him or if he’s a necessary pillar for both the present and future.
Once that’s finally decided, the Celtics can completely devote themselves to a reclamation project that can and should have started a couple years ago, when the internal conflicts that come with it wouldn’t have been as difficult to resolve as they are now.
Dan Favale is a firm believer in the three-pointer as well as the notion that defense doesn’t always win championships. His musings can be found at Bleacherreport.com in addition to TheHoopDoctors.com. Follow @danfavale on Twitter for his latest posts and all things NBA.