I respectfully disagree with your opinion. First off, you cannot blame Shaq for who he gets to play against. He was far and away better than all of his competitors. It’s interesting how you focus in on the ’95 Finals(where Shaq had above average numbers) and skip over the Lakers’ first 3 title runs in the early 2000′s where he put up numbers that are historically some of the best in the game’s history. He dominated from his rookie season and would have been an All Star in any generation.

Who else was a better center in the 2000′s? Yao Ming or Marcus Camby?

I don’t understand your arguement. He was good but shouldn’t make the list because there weren’t any other good centers?!?!?

I think that 9 out of 10 readers would agree with me.

Average deals USD30,1st order freebies: socks!?Free Fastest delievery,4-7days to door, Paypal payment 100% guaranteen safety , Return Policy.100% money back! Reliablity, Credibility, sustaining sale service?never forever fraud!
nikes-jordan.com

You are right with Iverson’s assists. It was a typo on my part. It should be 6.2 assists. He had 4 seasons of 5.5 or less which balance out the 7+ for a few seasons. They are still fantastic numbers.

As far as Iverson at the point, I didn’t want to shuffle positions for the sake of filling holes in the All Decade Teams. I wanted to keep players in their natural positions. For most of Iverson’s career in Philly, A.I. played the 2 guard position alongside Eric Snow at the point, even though he handled the ball quite a bit. Same with Garnett. Even though he had SF skills, he has always been a PF with his monstous rebound numbers. If I was going to shift players around I would have put Dirk Nowitzki on the 1st or 2nd Team at the 3 position.

I understand your logic though. Thanks for reading.

I would wager that his assists are well above 6apg this decade

Otherwise good list Docs.